Bali, A. S., Martire, K. A., & Edmond, G. (2021). Lay comprehension of statistical evidence: A novel measurement approach. Law and Human Behavior, 45(4), 370–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000457

Bali, A. S., Edmond, G., Ballantyne, K. N., Kemp, R. I., & Martire, K. A. (2020). Communicating forensic science opinion: An examination of expert reporting practices. Science & Justice, 60(3), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2019.12.005

Bali, A. S., Edmond, G., Ballantyne, K. N., Kemp, R. I., & Martire, K. A. (2021). Corrigendum to Communicating forensic science opinion: An examination of expert reporting practices [Sci. Justice 60 (3) (2020) 216-224]. Science and Justice, 61(4), 449-450.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2021.04.001

Basu, N., Bali, A.S., Weber, P., Rosas-Aguilar, C., Edmond, G., Martire, K.A. & Morrison, G.S. (2022). Speaker identification in courtroom contexts – Part I: Individual listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technology, Forensic Science International, 341, 111499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111499

Chin, J.M. (2020). Pre-recorded expert evidence in intimate partner violence cases. Current Issues in Criminal Justice. 32(4), 458. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2020.1830505

Chin, J.M., & Ibaviosa, C.M. (2022). Beyond CSI: Calibrating public beliefs about the reliability of forensic science through openness and transparency. Science & Justice 62(3), 272-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2022.02.006

Edmond, G., White, D., Towler, A., San, R.M. & Kemp R. (2021). Facial recognition and image comparison evidence: Identification by investigators, familiars, experts, super-recognisers and algorithm. Melbourne University Law Review, 45(1), 99-160. [PDF]

Martire, K.A., Ballantyne, K.N., Bali, A., Edmond, G., Kemp, R.I., & Found, B. (2019). Forensic science evidence: Naive estimates of false positive error rates and reliability. Forensic Science International, 302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109877

Martire, K.A., Growns, B., Bali, A.S., Summersby, S., & Younan, M. (2020). Limited but not lazy: a quantitative secondary analysis of evidence quality by those who hold implausible beliefs. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(65), 1-15. https://cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41235-020-00264-z

Martire, K.A., Edmond, G. & Navarro, D. (2020) Exploring juror evaluations of expert opinions using the Expert Persuasion Expectancy (ExPEx) Framework, Legal and Criminological Psychology, 25(2), 90-110 https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12165

Martire, K. A., & Kemp, R. I. (2009). The impact of eyewitness expert evidence and judicial instruction on juror ability to evaluate eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 33(3), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9134-z

Martire, K. A., & Kemp, R. I. (2011). Can experts help jurors to evaluate eyewitness evidence? A review of eyewitness expert effects. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16(1), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X477225

Martire, K. A., Kemp, R. I., & Newell, B. R. (2013). The psychology of interpreting expert evaluative opinions. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 45(3), 305-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2013.784361

Martire, K. A., Kemp, R. I., Sayle, M. A., & Newell, B. R. (2014). On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect. Forensic Sciences International, 240, 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.04.005

Martire, K. A., Kemp, R. I., Watkins, I., Sayle, M. A., & Newell, B. R. (2013). The expression and interpretation of uncertain forensic science evidence: Verbal equivalence, evidence strength and the weak evidence effect. Law & Human Behavior, 37(3), 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000027

Martire, K. A., & Montgomery-Farrer, B. (2020). Judging experts: Australian magistrates’ evaluations of expert opinion quality. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1751334

Martire, K. A., & Watkins, I. (2015). Perception problems of the verbal scale: A reanalysis and application of a membership function approach. Science and Justice, 55(4), 264-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2015.01

Neal, T.M.S., Lienert, P., Denne, E., & Singh, J.P. (2022). A general model of cognitive bias in human judgment and systematic review specific to forensic mental health. Law and Human Behavior, 46(2), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000482

Neal, S.M.T., Martire, A.K., Johan, L.J., Mathers, M.E. & Otto, K.R. (2022). The Law Meets Psychological Expertise: Eight Best Practices to Improve Forensic Psychological Assessment. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 18(1), 169-192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-050420-010148

Ribeiro, G., McKimmie, B. M., & Tangen, M. J. (2022). Diagnostic information produces better-calibrated judgments about forensic comparison evidence than likelihood ratios. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000062

Ribeiro, G., Tangen, J., & McKimmie, B. (2020). Does DNA evidence in the form of a likelihood ratio affect perceivers’ sensitivity to the strength of a suspect’s alibi? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(6), 1325-1332. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01784-x

Ribeiro, G., Tangen, J. M., & McKimmie, B. M. (2019). Beliefs about error rates and human judgment in forensic science. Forensic Science International, 297, 138-147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.034

Ross, R., Martire, K. A., & Kramer, K. (2017). Consistent with: What doctors say and jurors hear. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 51(1),109–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2017.1324583

Searston, R. A., & Tangen, J. M. (2017). The emergence of perceptual expertise with fingerprints over time. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 442–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.08.006

Searston, R. A., & Tangen, J. M. (2017). The style of a stranger: Identification expertise generalizes to coarser level categories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(4), 1324-1329. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1211-6

Tangen, J. M., Kent, K. M., & Searston, R. A. (2020). Collective intelligence in fingerprint analysis. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(23), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00223-8

Wray-Jones, N. & Chin, J. M. (2021) “Can ADR improve expert evidence?” 95 The Australian Law Journal 467. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3863689

Younan, M. & Martire, K.A. (2021) Likeability and expert persuasion: Dislikeability reduces the perceived persuasiveness of expert evidence. Frontiers in Psychology https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.785677