Human Factors

Bali, A. S., Martire, K. A., & Edmond, G. (2021). Lay comprehension of statistical evidence: A novel measurement approach. Law and Human Behavior, 45(4), 370–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000457

Chevroulet, C., Paterson H. M., Yu. A., Chew, E., & Kemp R. I. (2022). The impact of recall timing on the preservation of eyewitness memory, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 29(3), 471 - 486, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.1926366

Chin, J.M., Lutsky, M., & Dror, I. E. (2019). The biases of experts: An empirical analysis of expert witness challenges. Manitoba Law Journal. 42(4), 21. https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/m3s5p

Dunn, J. D., Kemp, R. I., & White, D. (2021). Top-down influences on working memory representations of faces: Evidence from dual-target visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(8), 1368-1377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218211014357

Dunn, J.D., Nicholls, V.I., Papinutto, M., Varela, V.P.L., White, D., & Miellet, S. (2021), Visual information sampling of faces by super-recognisers, Journal of Vision, 21(9), 2327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.2327

Dunn, J.D., Varela, V.P.L., Nicholls, V.I., Papinutto, M., White, D., Miellet, S. (2022). Face-Information Sampling in Super-Recognizers, Psychological Science, 33(9), 1615 - 1630. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09567976221096320

Grimmer, H., Laukkonen. R, Tangen, M. J., & von Hippel, W. (2022). Eliciting false insights with semantic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 29(3), 954-970. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-02049-x

Grimmer, H.J., Laukkonen, R. E., Freydenzon, A., von Hippel, W. & Tangen, J. M. (2022). Thinking style and psychosis proneness do not predict false insights. Consciousness and Cognition, 104, 103384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2022.103384

Growns, B., Dunn, J. D., Mattijssen, J. A. T., Quigley-McBride, A., & Towler, A. (2022). Match me if you can: Evidence for a domain-general visual comparison ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(3), 866-881. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02134-4

Growns, B. & Kukucka, J. (in press). The prevalence effect in fingerprint identification: match and non-match base-rates impact misses and false alarms. Applied Cognitive Psychology.

Growns, B., Mattijssen, E. J. A. T., Salerno, J. M., Schweitzer, N. J., Cole, S. A., & Martire, K. A. (2022). Finding the Perfect Match: Fingerprint Expertise Facilitates Statistical Learning and Visual Comparison Decision-Making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xap0000422

Growns, B. & Martire, K.A. (2020). Human factors in forensic science: the cognitive mechanisms that underlie forensic feature-comparison expertise. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 2, 148-153. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X20300371

Growns, B., Towler, A., & Martire, K. (2023). The novel object-matching test (NOM Test): A psychometric measure of visual comparison ability. Behavior Research Methods, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02069-6

Edmond, G., Tangen, J. M., Searston, R. A., & Dror, I. E. (2015). Contextual bias and cross-contamination in the forensic sciences: The implications for investigations, plea bargains, trials and appeals. Law, Probability & Risk, 14(1),1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgu018 [PDF]

Edmond, G., Towler, A., Growns, B., Ribeiro, G., Found, B., White, D., Ballantyne, K., Searston, R. A., Thompson, M. B., Tangen, J. M., Kemp, R. I., & Martire, K. (2017). Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners. Science & Justice, 57(2), 144-154. [PDF]

Laukkonen, E. R., Kaveladze, T. B., B., Protzko, J., Tangen, M. J., von Hippel. W., & Schooler, W.J. (2022). Irrelevant insights make worldviews ring true. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 2075. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41598-022-05923-3

Martire, K.A., Ballantyne, K.N., Bali, A., Edmond, G., Kemp, R.I., & Found, B. (2019) Forensic science evidence: Naive estimates of false positive error rates and reliability. Forensic Science International, 302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109877

McCarthy, R., Gervais, W. M., Aczel, B., Bègue, L., Cai, H., Cassese, E. C., ... & Vankov, I. I. (2021). A multi-site collaborative study of the hostile priming effect. Collabra: Psychology, 7(1), 18738.

Megreya, A. M., White, D. & Burton, A. M. (2011). The other race effect does not rely on memory: Evidence from a matching task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(8), 1473-1483. [PDF]

Neal, T.M.S., Lienert, P., Denne, E., & Singh, J.P. (2022). A general model of cognitive bias in human judgment and systematic review specific to forensic mental health. Law and Human Behavior, 46(2), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000482

O'Sullivan, K., Hunter, J., Kemp, R. I., & Vines, P. (2022). Judicial work and traumatic stress: Vilification, threats, and secondary trauma on the bench. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 28(4), 532–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000363

Penney, G., Launder, D., Cuthbertson, J., Thompson, M. B. (2022). Threat assessment, sense making, and critical decision-making in police, military, ambulance, and fire services. Cognition, Technology & Work, 24(1), 423-439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-022-00694-3

Ribeiro, G., Likwornik, H., & Chin, J. M. (2022). Visual decision aids: Improving laypeople's understanding of forensic science evidence. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000026

Ribeiro, G., McKimmie, B. M., & Tangen, M. J. (2022). Diagnostic information produces better-calibrated judgments about forensic comparison evidence than likelihood ratios. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000062

Ribeiro, G., Tangen, J. M., & McKimmie, B. M. (2019). Beliefs about error rates and human judgment in forensic science. Forensic Science International, 297, 138-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.034

Searston, R. A., Tangen, J. M., & Eva, K. W. (2016). Putting bias into context: The role of familiarity in identification. Law and Human Behavior, 40(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000154 [PDF]

Smith H.M.J., Andrews, S., Baguley, T.S., Colloff, M.F., Davis, J.P., White, D., Rockey, J.C., & Flowe, H.D. (2021). Performance of typical and superior face recognizers on a novel interactive face matching procedure, British Journal of Psychology, 112(1), 964 - 991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12499

Trinh, A., Dunn, J.D., White, D. (2022). Verifying unfamiliar identities: Effects of processing name and face information in the same identity-matching task. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7(92). https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00441-2

Varela, V.P. L., Towler, A., Kemp R. I., & White, D. (2023). Looking at faces in the wild, Scientific Reports, 13(783). 104-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25268-1

White, D., Burton, A.M. (2022). Individual differences and the multidimensional nature of face perception, Nature Reviews Psychology, 1, 287 - 300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00041-3

White, D., Norrell, K., Phillips, J. P., & O’Toole, A. J. (2017). Human factors in forensic face identification. In M. Tistarelli & C. Champod (Eds.), Springer Handbook of Biometrics in Forensic Science. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50673-9_9

White D; Sutherland CAM; Burton AL, (2021), 'Correction to: Choosing face: The curse of self in profile image selection (Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, (2017), 2, 1, (23), 10.1186/s41235-017-0058-3)', Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, vol. 6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00320-2

White, D., Wayne, T., & De Lima Varela V.P. (2021). Partitioning natural face image variability emphasises within-identity over between-identity representation for understanding accurate recognition, Cognition, 219, 104966. http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w58k3

White, D., Wayne, T., Varela V.P. L. (2022). Partitioning natural face image variability emphasises within-identity over between-identity representation for understanding accurate recognition, Cognition, 219, 104966. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104966

Wu, T., Singh, S., Lyons, G., Nielssen, O., Kemp, R., Johnson, A., & Dean, K. (2021). Characteristics and re-offending outcomes of 'limiting-term' forensic patients found unfit to stand trial in New South Wales, Australia. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 28(5), 733-747. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1837032